

Thank you for the info. The Intel processors really do look like they’re a better long term choice, for just about everything, including price.
My only real issue is that, at best, I’ve found that all the Intel motherboards support one 4.0x16 pcie slot, one 3.0x4 slot, and then a couple 3.0x1 slots. In short, one 32gbs slot, one 4gbps slot, and then three 1gbps slots. It just isn’t enough for my use; bare minimum I need 10gbps for networking, and then at least a 3.0x16 slot for the video card.
Well, I say need, but really this is a pride issue, making sure that things aren’t limited past their requirements.
I could maybe switch from the video card to the Intel iGPU; not sure how it handles multiple 4k streams, but even if it did work I’d still be missing out on the scratchdisk and SAS card being at full speed. I would also be severely limited on any other card upgrades I could make.
The epyc cpus have shittier power efficiency and single core speeds. But dammit, 3 pcie 3.0x16 slots with an additional three pcie 3.0x8 is just so tempting lmao.
I was hoping for a slightly smaller compromise than I’m seeing between server tier pcie lane capability and personal tier processor speeds and efficiencies. I even looked into the threadripper series and they’re more expensive with less features than the epyc series. More performant, but still severly limited in expandability.
Nvidia officially removed that limitation, and prior to that there was a workaround. I’ve been running it unlocked for a couple years now, and it handled four 4k streams just fine, but crashed at 5 or so. Plenty for who I’m sharing with, considering 4k is a only-sometimes sort of deal.
Lmao whoops. Looks like I am. This actually adds a couple options back to the table.
Oh my god this is perfect. Like, exactly what I was looking for. And it’s cheaper than an epyc motherboard. Thank you so much. Definitely putting this on the list for sure.