• 0 Posts
  • 7 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: October 27th, 2023

help-circle



  • if you’re using ZFS’ RAID1 and lose 2 drives, it all goes. Or RAID2 and lose 3 drives, it all goes. Because the data is allocated across many drives, there is not a fundamental “one file one drive” scenario

    That has nothing to do with how you setup ZFS though…

    That is just the reality of how redundant arrays work, whether its ZFS or hardware RAID

    Losing 2 or 3 disks at once should be a very low probability and either way it shouldn’t be a big issue if you have backups (raid and unraid aren’t backups)



  • I actually pulled the parity drive out of my array just to get better speeds because with parity you’re automatically 1/2-ing your disk write i/o. With WD shucks 5400 rpm’s I should be able to hit over 100 mb/s writes, but with parity plus sabnzb repairing I’m lucky to get 40 mb/s. It’s just abysmal.

    Yeah you will only hit max speed on any disk when doing pure sequential workloads, if starts doing multiple things at once and writing to different spots your write speed will take a hit

    I have 2x20TB, 7x8TB, and 1x6TB spinners and 3x500GB SSDs, so a typical RAID setup isn’t really possible.

    You could still try something like truenas

    You could create a 60TB pool by doing a mirror vdev (2x20TB) + a raidz2 vdev (7x8TB)

    In terms of parity you would be on par with your unraid setup, and in terms of speed you would be combining the speed of the slowest 20TB disk + something like the average speed of 5 disks on the raidz2

    Also you’d be using ZFS so your files would be checksumed to protect against bitrot

    The SSDs you could either use them as a metadata + small files vdev for that 60TB pool or use them in a second all SDD pool

    The 6TB disk i can’t really fit it anywhere unfortunately, maybe as an offline backup for some of your more important files?

    I don’t know anything about windows storage unfortunately… Good luck