AT&T came today to connect their router to the ONT device. Installer connects two fragments of cat 6 with scotchlocks. Do they really expect gigabit to work over this? Am I being silly?

  • Sekhen@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Those are great for telephone connections.

    Absolute garbage for ethernet.

  • TwoScoopsofDestroyer@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s probably better than some of the connections where they untwist like 2-3 inches (or more 😬) on either side of a crimp or punchdown connection.

  • mcribgaming@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s unacceptable, but I’d be curious how long it would last and what kind of speed I could get out of those scothlocks. I’d run it like that for a while, just to see what happens. You can fix it in minutes at any time.

    If you want to experiment a little before making a change, now is the time. Honestly I’d put the under/over on how long you could use them with no problems at something high. Like 7.5 Years. Ethernet is just very robust, even with shit wiring.

  • viperfan7@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Uhhh, wtf was that installer thinking, get them back out there to terminate it properly

  • gooberfoob86@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Scotchlocks work fine. I work for a phone company, and they are used a lot working with adsl service. Then that technique is used in fiber installs, because techs don’t do a lot of rj45 crimps. Its just a matter of what the tech is good at. This wire management could have been nicer. Still… it gets the job done.

  • eepybird@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve connected two cat6 cables with wago connectors just to prove to someone it would work

  • Live_Reason_6531@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Trash work, though it will probably work fine. I would request they send someone out to do it right. When they refused I would just do it myself.

  • Balla1991@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why did he give you a 210? I install for ATT for a living and don’t use those ONTsv unless absolutely necessary.

    To your question you can absolutely get 1gb speeds with an install done that way… I haven’t been able to order rj45 ends in 6 months so I’ve been forced to do some jobs this way where running a single patch cord wasn’t feasible.

    Edit: I just noticed the fiber half circle lmao

        • knox902@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Assuming you’re a third party contractor for At&t, your work should really reassess who they are using as a distro if they have not been able to order RJ45 ends for 6 months. That’s a pretty ridiculous thing to just shrug off.

        • No_Jello_5922@alien.topB
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          LOL, I guess that’s perk of working for a small business. I buy what I need and expense it. Everyone in the office uses my label maker, company pays for new label tape. I need RJ45 ends, I hit up Amazon or Microcenter, submit it on my expense report with my mileage.

  • mousepad1234@alien.topB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Scotchloks work in a pinch but aren’t recommended and it makes the install look ugly. That being said, you can absolutely negotiate 1gbit full duplex without any errors, and the cable will be fine to use. I’ve used them in situations where I had nothing else and needed a halfway decent connection. I’ve also tested over cabling terminated with Scotchloks with a tdr and they show no difference or reflectivity along the wire. It could be worse, they could’ve used wire nuts. Or used cat3.